![]() ![]() ![]() Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 750.6 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 2138.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Process Creation 4660.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 54291.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1501.6 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 10303.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Process Creation 13281.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 366806.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Call Overhead 1781872.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1283.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 2754.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Process Creation 3349.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 35261.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualizationĬPU 1: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU J1900 1.99GHz (4000.2 bogomips)ĬPU 2: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU J1900 1.99GHz (4000.2 bogomips)ĬPU 3: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU J1900 1.99GHz (4000.2 bogomips)ġ5:04:08 up 14 min, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.03, 0.05 runlevel 2Ĥ CPUs in system running 1 parallel copy of testsĭhrystone 2 using register variables 11760186.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)ĭouble-Precision Whetstone 2089.0 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)Įxecl Throughput 1102.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)įile Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 383950.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)įile Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 105994.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)įile Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 924455.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Besonders beim Datei – Kopiertest schneided CentOS viel schlechter ab. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |